I was reading an article in the April 2006 issue of
The Atlantic on the
NSA and their purported ability to snoop on all information, everywhere. The piece is a bit of hype given the
domestic "wiretapping" (they mean to say
signal intelligence gathering, apparently) press of late. One page of the article had an inset on the 2002 predator drone strike in Marib, Yemen that killed Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi. Harethi, the article says, was a high priority target. Below is an image of a predator drone like the one in the attack.

The story goes on to say that when a cell phone was used, a monitoring team saw the alert, located the call using GPS, and began listening. The people involved made the decision to attack the target after listening to the speakers on the phone. This time, Harethi's driver was using the phone and only when Harethi began giving directions to his driver did the staffer realize the target was present.
Let's consider this problem. Harethi was using any number of cellphones and cards between cell phones to avoid eavesdropping or tracking. The NSA was able to be alerted to any one of the phones/cards being used and immediately listen to the conversation. The NSA located the cell phone using GPS. The CIA launched an attack from an unmanned Predator drone carrying Hellfire missles. There's much to be said about these technological feats, but there's more to be said and done about the 20th century approaches to the rest of the operation.
A human being, trained to speak in the language of the enemy, had to be listening in real-time in order for this mission to succeed. The human had to listen to a conversation containing at least three people, separate who was saying what and when, and determine that Harethi was one of the speakers. There is no way, today, to get a computer to do these human tasks, but it poses a nice playground for research.