Recently, where recently is defined as a time in the not too distant past, I read an interview with Bill Gates that was linked from Slashdot and it got me to thinking about the current state of digital media and the efforts at protecting intellectual property with DRM technology. I had a discussion about this with a friend and came to the conclusion that the problem with digital rights management isn't that it exists, or that people are pushing it as a solution, or even that people are using it. The problem is the paradigm by which it's being used. If we are to follow the logic that Bill Gates laid out in his interview and the logic that the music industry uses to make it's case for this technology, we would be able to make the logical conclusion that all things are intellectual property and therefore should be protected.
Case in point, the major reason that the MPAA argues it needs to protect CDs is that people are able to compress it to a file and share it over the internet, making millions of duplicates from just one CD, costing the artist, and more importantly the recording company millions of dollars in lost revenue. By that same logic, when I go to the store and purchase furniture, and choose to one day sell or give that furniture to a friend, that translates into lost revenue to the furniture maker because my friend didn't make a purchase from the company. The problem of course is that we can't protect a couch with DRM the way we can protect bits on a computer, but no one makes a big deal out of this scenario because I can't make millions of duplicates of the furniture and distribute them the way I can with an mp3 file.
The conclusion I came to, though I'm not yet sure how it could be implemented, is to add metadata onto every bit a computer ever writes. If we can distinguish this bit from that bit, we can easily determine if a file has been written more than once and invalidate one copy of it. It would be hard to make a case against DRM technology that worked in such a manner because it does for electronic media what being tangible does for a couch. It prevents the file from being mass distributed and eliminates the valid argument that the MPAA makes for why it needs to protect it's intellectual property.